Alan Grayson Voting Records, Corruption Findings, Earmarking Tendencies

Alan Grayson’s Recent Voting Records and Legislative History in Congress

Indications of Corruption or Ethical Dysfunction

Earmarking Summary

State: Florida
Party: Democrat
Former Occupation: Lawyer
Representative Since: 2009

Next Election: 2010

Alan Grayson Corruption and/or Ethical Failures:

No Corruption Found

Alan Grayson Voting or Legislative History in Congress:

Tort Reform - Medical Malpractice Reform S11 7/03:
Representative Grayson has no voting history regarding medical malpractice reform
Balanced Budget Amendment:
No, Grayson has not supported requiring Congress to spend within government means.
Oil Drilling in US - ANWR (Alaska) HouseVote#831 8/07, Offshore HR4761 6/06:
Alan Grayson has no voting record on energy independence including drilling for US oil supplies.
Cap and Trade HR 2454 6/09:
Yes, Grayson supports increased taxes and surcharges on US production of goods and energy.
Amnesty/Citizenship for Illegal Border Crossers S2611 5/06:
Alan Grayson has no voting record on border control or amnesty citizenship for illegal aliens.
Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act HR 4173 12/09:
Yes, Alan Grayson supports federal government expansion of involvement and control over private industry.
Auto Company Bailouts HR 7005 12/08:
No voting record regarding taxpayer bailouts of private industry
Bank Bailouts -TARP HR1424 10/08:
Grayson has no voting record regarding taxpayer bailouts for financial institutions that gamble and lose
2009 Stimulus Bill HR1 2/09:
Yes, Supported the $787 Billion spending plan
2009 Omnibus HR1105 3/09:
Yes, Representative Grayson supported the 9000+ earmark, 8.3% government expansion bill
Health Care HR3590 12/09:
Yes, Supported laying groundwork for federal takeover of Healthcare delivery

Alan Grayson Earmark History:

Light Compared to Colleagues in House of Representatives
- $11,992,000 of taxpayer money requested by Alan Grayson in 2009 budget specifically for entities and projects not considered worthy of financing through transparent means in the official federal budget.(Ref: Grayson earmark disclosures)